Rape In Britain In The Late 18th Century and Early 19th Century free essay sample

Analyzes legitimate, social, conjugal, artistic, hypothetical, good, class and women's activist issues, concentrating on the perspectives on ladies as assets of men. The motivation behind this examination is to look at the issue of assault in Great Britain in the late eighteenth and mid nineteenth hundreds of years. The arrangement of the examination will be to presented the social and social setting where the issue accomplishes noteworthiness and afterward to talk about examples of action inside the way of life that seem to show an advancement of cognizance and needs in the comprehension of the marvel. The conceptualization of assault in Britain in the eighteenth and nineteenth hundreds of years seems to have been a lot of a social development that commanded the entire of Western culture, regardless of whether in England and the Empire, on the mainland, or in the U.S. In this manner anyway assault may have been seen or experienced at the individual level, the chief social reality about the marvel was that it was auxiliary to all the more broadly held perspectives on social

Would You Sign Charles 1 Death Warrant free essay sample

Charles I would not collaborate or like to work with parliament. He accepted firmly in divine right and complied with it all through his rule. This is the thing that began the common war. This anyway doesn't imply that Charles ought to have been condemned to death. Right off the bat there was no law in English History that managed the preliminary of a ruler and the request depended on an antiquated roman law. People in general were not permitted into the court until the charge was perused out. This leaves a waiting inquiry with regards to why they would do this if the y felt that their body of evidence against Charles was simply. Charles was not given a reasonable blameworthy decision. There were just 135 adjudicators in the jury some were Parliament, armed force officials and land proprietors. Out of the 135 appointed authorities just 80 appeared so he naturally had 55 adjudicators arguing not blameworthy. 68 of the 80 appointed authorities said that Charles was liable. We will compose a custom paper test on Would You Sign Charles 1 Death Warrant or then again any comparative point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page So far altogether there were 67 individuals who saw him not as blameworthy. Just 59 appointed authorities really marked the execution order. The chances were for Charles not being sent to death. The execution order was not defended in light of the fact that the proof didn't bolster a liable decision. Charles declined to himself against the charges set forward by Parliament. At long last on 27th January 1649 when Charles would not protect himself he was condemned to death at the High Court of Justice meeting in Westminster Hall. The main charge of the case was â€Å"That he ignored the desire of Parliament and governed by his own will. † In this specific charge Charles was liable as he didn't counsel parliament over significant choices and he just took exhortation from a little gathering of individuals whom he loved. He raised duties without parliaments assent. Charles didn't accept he was doing anything incorrectly in light of the fact that he had faith in divine right which implied God had picked him to be his delegate and no one but God could pass judgment on any out of line conduct; no law of court reserved an option to condemn over him. Any individual who conflicted with this and endeavored to limit his capacity as ruler would resist the desire of God and may include a heretical demonstration. Additionally Charless reserved the option to choose to lead without Parliament since it was in fact inside the Kings illustrious right. The subsequent charge was â€Å"That he did fiendishly make war on his own subjects. despite the fact that Charles went to oxford to raise a military against parliament common war essentially couldn't be maintained a strategic distance from in view of the high measure of contention among Charles and Parliament. At the point when Charles required cash to shield himself against the Scots he had no real option exce pt to go to parliament for help. Presently parliament had a hold over King Charles and requested the Earl of Stratford, one of Charles most significant pastors, to execution. Charles fought back by endeavoring to capture five MPS, who were the greatest pundits, he fizzled on the grounds that they had heard new of this and fled. In general the Civil War was the flaw of both Parliament and the King. Charge three was â€Å"that he was liable for all the killings, raping’s, burnings. † parliament controlled the more extravagant and all the more thickly south east so Charles couldn't have been answerable for ALL of these allegations. The following charge was â€Å"That he begun war in the wake of being crushed. † Parliament offered him an understanding that they would manage however Charles could keep his government. This offer made by Parliament conflicted with Charles convictions of awesome right so he didn't concur. Charles likewise gave up to the Scots after he was crushed. I would not have marked Charles execution order since it was unlawful and wrong. Oliver Cromwell was not reasonable for the lord and a portion of the charges which were made against him were wrong. The execution order ought to never been marked in light of the fact that the majority of the jury didn't try to turn up on the grounds that they thought it was wrong and out of the ones that turned up just 59 marked the real execution order, one of them being Oliver Cromwell in this manner he ought to never have been condemned to death.

The Girls Who Read Madeleine LEngle

The Girls Who Read Madeleine LEngle In a 2004 New Yorker essay, writer Cynthia Zarin recounts something a college friend said to her: “There are really two kinds of girls. Those who read Madeleine L’Engle when they were small, and those who didn’t.” I dont take this literally, as Im not much of one for grand-yet-arbitrary binary statements, but I found myself nodding along anyway. LEngle wrote revolutionary books; books that, to this day, remain unusual in many story aspects, particularly in her female protagonists. The girls who read Madeleine LEngle read books that could change the world because they could change us. LEngle was my first introduction to literary SFF; I am not entirely sure why I ever picked up A Wrinkle in Time to begin with. Was it the pink cover with the majestic wingéd centaur? Was it the curious title? I was immediately charmed by Meg Murry, a misfit girl like me who thought she was ugly and often acted out against her own better judgment. I didnt know as a child how rare it was to read a science fiction story driven by the flawed strength of a lady (much less a ladychild), but I did know that Meg and I were the same and that Meg did great, brave things even though she ran off at the mouth too much sometimes. I knew that Meg was great at math and that women could be smart scientists and do important work. I knew even that women could be powerful beings who sometimes have to save men. I knew these things before the world told me any differently and I am grateful for that. The search for a father, and disappointment in the finding, is a theme that runs through LEngles fiction and that could be taken both literally (as it seems she found her own father lacking, from what I have read about her) and figuratively (the religious aspects of her work). That I can relate to at least some of this is incidental and specific to me, but what I appreciate as a woman is her indignation in the face of disappointment. When Mr. Murry failed to save Charles Wallace from IT, when he nearly destroyed Meg with inept space-time travel, Meg questioned him brutally, relentlessly: how could you let this happen? Why didnt you do better? Published in 1963, a book featuring young girl questioning her father like that didnt jibe with the established social order; it still doesnt entirely fit. Yet there is no reason why this should not be; there is no reason not to question a person whose poor decisions are found wanting. Meg Murry-cum-LEngle gave me the tools to question my own life, which saved me from internalizing a lot of damaging ideas. Do better is a message that women werent allowed to give to men for a very long time, but LEngle put it out there plainly: if you fall short, you must do better. The idea that a father can fall short in the eyes of his daughter, the idea that he isnt protected by his position in the family, was a bit revolutionary in itself. I like to think that the girls who read LEngle absorbed this, even if we didnt consciously sort it out in our youth. I like to think that we absorbed that our lady-flaws arent necessarily flaws at all, that sometimes they can be world-saving tools, that they can give us power. Madeleine LEngle is a brick in a road that we have been laying for far too long and yet not long enough: the road to undeniable female personhood, where we will stand up and be counted rather than diminished or pushed aside. The girls who read LEngle may have laid their own first brick from her stories; I certainly did. Sign up to The Kids Are All Right to receive news and recommendations from the world of kid lit and middle grade books.

Roots of the Mexican-American War

The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) was a long, bloody conflict between the United States of America and Mexico. It would be fought from California to Mexico City and many points in between, all of them on Mexican soil. The USA won the war by capturing Mexico City in September of 1847 and forcing the Mexicans to negotiate a truce favorable to US interests. By 1846, war was nearly inevitable between the USA and Mexico. On the Mexican side, the lingering resentment over the loss of Texas was intolerable. In 1835, Texas, then part of the Mexican State of Coahuila and Texas, had risen in revolt. After setbacks at the Battle of the Alamo and the Goliad Massacre, the Texan rebels stunned Mexican General Antonio Là ³pez de Santa Anna at the Battle of San Jacinto on April 21, 1836. Santa Anna was taken prisoner and forced to recognize Texas as an independent nation. Mexico, however, did not accept Santa Annas agreements and considered Texas nothing more than a rebellious province. Since 1836, Mexico had half-heartedly tried to invade Texas and take it back, without much success. The Mexican people, however, clamored for their politicians to do something about this outrage. Although privately many Mexican leaders knew that reclaiming Texas was impossible, to say so in public was political suicide. The Mexican politicians outdid each other in their rhetoric saying that Texas must be brought back into Mexico. Meanwhile, tensions were high on the Texas/Mexico border. In 1842, Santa Anna sent a small army to attack San Antonio: the Texas responded by attacking Santa Fe. Not long after, a bunch of Texan hotheads raided the Mexican town of Mier: they were captured and poorly treated until their release. These events and others were reported in the American press and were generally slanted to favor the Texan side. The simmering disdain of Texans for Mexico thus spread to the entire USA. In 1845, the USA began the process of annexing Texas to the union. This was truly intolerable for Mexicans, who may have been able to accept Texas as a free republic but never part of the United States of America. Through diplomatic channels, Mexico let it be known that to annex Texas was practically a declaration of war. The USA went ahead anyway, which left Mexican politicians in a pinch: they had to do some saber-rattling or look weak. Meanwhile, the USA had its eye on Mexicos northwestern possessions, such as California and New Mexico. The Americans wanted more land and believed that their country should stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The belief that America should expand to fill the continent was called Manifest Destiny. This philosophy was expansionist and racist: its proponents believed that the noble and industrious Americans deserved those lands more than the degenerate Mexicans and Native Americans who lived there. The USA tried on a couple of occasions to purchase those lands from Mexico, and was rebuffed every time. President James K. Polk, however, would not take no for an answer: he meant to have California and Mexicos other western territories and he would go to war to have them. Fortunately for Polk, the border of Texas was still in question: Mexico claimed it was the Nueces River while the Americans claimed it was the Rio Grande. In early 1846, both sides sent armies to the border: by then, both nations were looking for an excuse to fight. It wasnt long before a series of small skirmishes bloomed into war. The worst of the incidents was the so-called Thornton Affair of April 25, 1846 in which a squad of American cavalrymen under the command of Captain Seth Thornton was attacked by a much larger Mexican force: 16 Americans were killed. Because the Mexicans were in contested territory, President Polk was able to ask for a declaration of war because Mexico had †¦shed American blood upon the American soil. Larger battles followed within two weeks and both nations had declared war on one another by May 13. The war would last about two years, until spring of 1848. The Mexicans and Americans would fight about ten major battles, and the Americans would win all of them. In the end, the Americans would capture and occupy Mexico City and dictate terms of the peace agreement to Mexico. Polk got his lands: according to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, formalized in May of 1848, Mexico would hand over most of the current US Southwest (the border established by the treaty is very similar to todays border between the two nations) in exchange for $15 million dollars and forgiveness of some previous debt. Sources: Brands, H.W. Lone Star Nation: the Epic Story of the Battle for Texas Independence. New York: Anchor Books, 2004. Eisenhower, John S.D. So Far from God: the U.S. War with Mexico, 1846-1848. Norman: the University of Oklahoma Press, 1989 Henderson, Timothy J. A Glorious Defeat: Mexico and its War with the United States.New York: Hill and Wang, 2007. Wheelan, Joseph. Invading Mexico: Americas Continental Dream and the Mexican War, 1846-1848. New York: Carroll and Graf, 2007.

The Russel County Middle School Situation Analysis

Introduction Part of the Russell County Middle School (RCMS) mission statement declares that we as an organization will help students accomplish what they are capable of. Procedures are in place to assist special education students and cater to gifted students, but some students seem to fall through the cracks. About five percent of the student population is retained each year and about one percent fail to capitalize on the opportunity to be promoted mid-year the following school year. A review of these students’ average data showed that absenteeism and discipline were issues, but that the students performed on or close to grade level on standardized tests. A group was formed to determine root causes and develop a plan of action to reduce the number of students that are retained each year and help those that have been retained to get back on track. A consensus was reached that a lack of motivation was the underlying cause for students’ poor classroom performance and resulting retention. After brainstorming and evaluating options, the group decided to implement a mentoring program in which faculty and staff members that did not teach the retained students would meet with them periodically to build relationships and encourage them. Challenges At the conclusion of the 2012-2013 school year, 28 students were retained that returned to RCMS the following year. This group of students averaged over twenty-three absences from school, 4.5 days in in-school suspension, 4.9 daysShow MoreRelatedProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 PagesLeadership Chapter 2 Organization Strategy and Project Selection 1.4 Projects and programs (.2) 1.4.1 Managing the portfolio 1.4.3 Strategy and projects 2.3 Stakeholders and review boards 12.1 RFP’s and vendor selection (.3.4.5) 11.2.2.6 SWAT analysis 6.5.2.7 Schedule compression 9.4.2.5 Leadership skills G.1 Project leadership 10.1 Stakeholder management Chapter 11 Teams Chapter 3 Organization: Structure and Culture 2.4.1 Organization cultures [G.7] 2.4.2 Organization structureRead MoreBrand Building Blocks96400 Words   |  386 Pages 4. Complex Brand Strategies And Relationships There was a time, not too long ago, when a brand was a clear, singular entity. Colgate, for example, was a brand name that simply needed to be defined, established, and nurtured. Today, the situation is far different. There are subbrands, brand extensions, ingredient brands, endorser brands, and corporate brands. The Coke logo can be found on a dozen products, including Diet Cherry Coke, Caffeine Free Diet Coke, and Coke Classic - and it doesn

Nosql Free Essays

Security Issues in NoSQL Databases Lior Okman Deutsche Telekom Laboratories at Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel Nurit Gal-Oz, Yaron Gonen, Ehud Gudes Deutsche Telekom Laboratories at Ben-Gurion University, and Dept of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel Jenny Abramov Deutsche Telekom Laboratories at Ben-Gurion University and Dept of Information Systems Eng. Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel Abstract—The recent advance in cloud computing and distributed web applications has created the need to store large amount of data in distributed databases that provide high availability and scalability. In recent years, a growing number of companies have adopted various types of non-relational databases, commonly referred to as NoSQL databases, and as the applications they serve emerge, they gain extensive market interest. We will write a custom essay sample on Nosql or any similar topic only for you Order Now These new database systems are not relational by definition and therefore they do not support full SQL functionality. Moreover, as opposed to relational databases they trade consistency and security for performance and scalability. As increasingly sensitive data is being stored in NoSQL databases, security issues become growing concerns. This paper reviews two of the most popular NoSQL databases Cassandra and MongoDB) and outlines their main security features and problems. Index Terms—NoSQL; Security; Cassandra; MongoDB; I. INTRODUCTION The recent advance in cloud computing and distributed web applications has created the need to store large amount of data in distributed databases that provide high availability and scalability. In recent years, a growing number of companies have adopted various types of non-relational databases, commonly referred to as NoSQL databases and as the applications they serve emerge, they gained extensive market interest. Different NoSQL databases t ake different approaches. Their primary advantage is that, unlike relational databases, they handle unstructured data such as documents, e-mail, multimedia and social media efficiently. The common features of NoSQL databases can be summarized as: high scalability and reliability, very simple data model, very simple (primitive) query language, lack of mechanism for handling and managing data consistency and integrity constraints maintenance(e. g. , foreign keys), and almost no support for security at the database level. The CAP theorem introduced by Eric Brewer [1], refers to the three properties of shared-data systems namely data onsistency, system availability and tolerance to network partitions. The theorem [2] states that only two of these three properties can be simultaneously provided by the system. Traditional DBMS designers have prioritized the consistency and availability properties. The rise of large web applications and distributed data systems, makes the partition-tolerance property inevitable, thu s imposing compromise on either consistency or availability. The main promoters of NOSQL databases are Web 2. 0 companies with huge, growing data and infrastructure needs such as Amazon and Google. The Dynamo technology developed t Amazon [3] and the Bigtable distributed storage system developed at Google [4], have inspired many of today’s NoSQL applications. In this paper we analyze the security problems of two of the most popular NoSQL databases, namely: Cassandra and MongoDB. Cassandra [5] is a distributed storage system for managing very large amounts of structured data spread out across many commodity servers, while providing highly available service with no single point of failure. Cassandra aims to run on top of an infrastructure of hundreds of nodes. At this scale, components fail often and Cassandra is designed to survive these failures. While in many ways Cassandra resembles a database and shares many design and implementation strategies therewith, Cassandra does not support a full relational data model; instead, it provides clients with a simple data model that supports dynamic control over data layout and format. Cassandra was designed to support the Inbox search feature of Facebook [6]. As such it can support over 100 million users which use the system continuously. MongoDB [7] is a document database developed by 10gen. It manages collections of JSON-like documents. Many applications can thus model data in a more natural way, as data can e nested in complex hierarchies and still be query-able and indexable. Documents are stored in collections, and collections are in turn stored in a database. A collection is similar to a table in relational DBMS, but a collection lacks any schema. MongoDB also provides high availability and scalability by using Shardings and Replica sets (see below). The increasing popularity of NoSQL databases such as Cassandra and MongoDB and the large amounts of userrelated sensitive information stored in these databases raise the concern for the confidentiality and privacy of the data and the security provided by these systems. In this paper we review the main security features and problems of these two database systems. We start with a brief overview of Cassandra and MongoDB functionality in section II. We then discuss security features of Cassandra and MongoDB in sections III and IV respectively. We conclude in section V. Since much of the discussion is based on open-source Internet documents, it naturally reflects the situation at the time this paper is written 2011 International Joint Conference of IEEE TrustCom-11/IEEE ICESS-11/FCST-11 978-0-7695-4600-1/11 $26. 00 Â © 2011 IEEE DOI 10. 1109/TrustCom. 2011. 70 541 How to cite Nosql, Essay examples

mrs. Essays - Family Law, Divorce, Marriage, Parenting,

changing the laws on divorces where men have equal right to their children. Men should be able to get the children the same as a woman. I have found that men are treated unfair just because the are a male. In a case which is about to come up in court soon, there are paper showing this woman has filed for social security for the following reason: lost of memory, seizure disorder, head trauma, migraine headaches and back injury. This should be enough to give custody to the father who is fighting for custody. Due to memory lost alone she could put the child health in danger,little alone the other thing she has filed for. Such as: having migraine headaces, when you have to take maedican for this it puts you to sleep most of the time.This is about the only way to get over a migraine, I know because my youngest son has had them senice she was eight years of age and has to take meds for them. Then there is back injury: if the child was to get hurt and need you to pick them up to get them un chock then you would not be able to do this either. Head trauma this could show that you are not capital of thinking or reacting in away that is needed to acted on. May cause slow reactions also. Then there is seizure disorder: This could put the child in danger should the person have a seizure while the child is left in that person care. Where dose the courts take in concideration with these facts? They have a tendtives to over look the well being of the child just because it is a woman. There is also other things that I find are unfair to men. My oldest son by court order could not move to cut cost or change his address, bank account,or insurnaces,or any thing else, he had to keep a child that was not his on his insurance even thought the state of Georgia was carring her and the child father also had insurance on her. But on the other had the mother lied to get temp. custody of the child even though the week before she loaded her into my car and pack my granddauther things for her to come home with me. Danielle has spent every months at least two weeks out of the months with us since she was born. We had her stay with us until she was 6 days old. The day she came home from the hospital she was brought to us because the mother said she was to sore to take care of her. My son David worked nights at that time so he asked if we would keep her for him until Friday morning. I asked him what was wrong with Heather, who was the mother? He said she said she was hurting so ba d that she could not take care of her. The only thing that sould of be sore was he back side, I know I was there when Danielle was born. So why dose the court say she is the best parent? She didn't even want to take care of her when she came home from the hospital. We even have other things such as written letters from people who have been around her tell how she is. Such as: the landlord, Friends,her ex hudband. We also have statement where she has been running to the doctor everytime she turns around. I have pictures of the house wherer she supposted of clean it and it still a filt mess. The landlord even stated this and also stated she was at home full time and no reason to have a filty house with food, cloths, toys,papers, dishes in the sink. I also know for a fact she quick her job at MacDonalds even though she had a child by another man. This caused them to have to file bankrupt. So how do you get the laws change to where they are equal for both parents. The laws should be where both parents have to have a job and both parents should be given joint costody with neither of them